State v. Sigmon

1 Citing case

  1. Benzing v. North Carolina

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-000619-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jun. 23, 2020)   Cited 3 times

    Accordingly, restricting Plaintiff's ability to travel does not violate his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. See Donoghue v. N.C. Dept. of Corr., 166 N.C. App. 612, 617 (2004) (requiring a probationer to "remain within the jurisdiction of the court" was a regular condition of probation); State v. Sigmon, 157 N.C. App. 143 (2003) (same); Midgette, 478 F.3d at 620 (same). Further, the home visits that Plaintiff alleges were intended to "embarrass and/or humiliate" him are, according to Defendants, simply an even-handed standard policy requirement and, in any event, are a valid probation policy and restriction.