From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Shufelt

Supreme Court of Vermont. February Term, 1935
May 9, 1935
179 A. 3 (Vt. 1935)

Opinion

Opinion filed May 9, 1935.

INFORMATION for violation of the so-called Blanket Act, P.L. 8602. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1934, Orleans County, Cleary, J., presiding. Verdict of guilty and judgment thereon. The respondent excepted. No error. Exceptions overruled. Let execution be done.

E.J. Smith and David E. Porter for the respondent.

Lee E. Emerson, State's attorney, for the State.

Present: POWERS, C.J., MOULTON, THOMPSON, and SHERBURNE, JJ., and BUTTLES, Supr. J.


This is a prosecution under P.L. Sec. 8602, commonly known as the Blanket Act.

This case and State v. Myrtie Belle Woods, ante page 354, 179 A. 1, were tried together below and heard together in this Court. The two respondents are charged with being particeps criminis in the same offense, and the same questions are involved.

For the reasons specified in our opinion in State v. Woods, supra. Judgment that there is no error in the record. Exceptions overruled. Let execution be done.


Summaries of

State v. Shufelt

Supreme Court of Vermont. February Term, 1935
May 9, 1935
179 A. 3 (Vt. 1935)
Case details for

State v. Shufelt

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. LEO SHUFELT

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont. February Term, 1935

Date published: May 9, 1935

Citations

179 A. 3 (Vt. 1935)
179 A. 3

Citing Cases

In re Estate of Shufelt

Quite the contrary. The State intervened. (Reported in 107 Vt. 358) Although the decedent was not legally…

Giering v. Lemoine

In the instant case we think it is clearly established that the defendant did not give Dr. Tarver a…