From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Shively

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 26, 1969
219 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1969)

Opinion

No. 38051.

February 26, 1969.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Mary Schulman and Halley B. Lewis, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioner.

Marvin B. Woods of Stanley, Durrance, Woods Wines, Lakeland, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of October 24, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Attorney's fees in the sum of $250.00 are hereby awarded respondent for the services of its attorney herein.

DREW, Acting C.J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Shively

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 26, 1969
219 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1969)
Case details for

State v. Shively

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA CITRUS EXPERIMENT STATION, PETITIONER, v. BILLY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 26, 1969

Citations

219 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1969)