From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Shinyama

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Feb 14, 2002
23669 (Haw. Feb. 14, 2002)

Opinion

23669

February 14, 2002.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CR. NO. 99-0457(2))

Deborah L. Kim, Deputy Public Defender, on the motion


ORDER


Upon consideration of Respondent/Defendant-Appellant Daniel E. K. Shinyama's motion for order to strike the application for writ of certiorari filed by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii, the papers in support, and the records and files herein, it appears that the application for a writ of certiorari filed by the State of Hawaii does not comply with the requirements set forth in Rules 32(a) and 32(b) of the Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Arleen Y. Watanabe, Esq., attorney for Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee, shall, within 10 days after the date of this order, show cause as to why she should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with HRAP Rules 32(a) and 32(b). Failure to respond to this order may result in sanctions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to strike the application for writ of certiorari is denied.


Summaries of

State v. Shinyama

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Feb 14, 2002
23669 (Haw. Feb. 14, 2002)
Case details for

State v. Shinyama

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF HAWAI`I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee v. DANIEL E. K. SHINYAMA…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Feb 14, 2002

Citations

23669 (Haw. Feb. 14, 2002)