From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Shillingford

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 17, 2000
766 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 2000)

Opinion

No. SC95451

Opinion filed August 17, 2000

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict

Fourth District — Case No. 4D98-2874

(Broward County)

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand and Barbara A. Zappi, Assistant Attorneys General, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, for Petitioner

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Assistant Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Respondent.


We initially accepted review of the opinion in State v. Shillingford, 731 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the opinion in State v. Gitto, 731 So.2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

QUINCE, J., dissents.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.


Summaries of

State v. Shillingford

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 17, 2000
766 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Shillingford

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner v. LEVON SHILLINGFORD, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Aug 17, 2000

Citations

766 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 2000)