From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sheltra

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Mar 8, 2016
Docket No. 43562 (Idaho Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 43562 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 420

03-08-2016

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHAWN V. SHELTRA, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen years, affirmed; order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Shawn V. Sheltra, Jr., pled guilty to sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen years. Idaho Code § 18-1506(1)(a). The district court sentenced Sheltra to a unified sentence of fifteen years with two years determinate and retained jurisdiction. Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished jurisdiction and executed the original sentence. Sheltra appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence and by relinquishing jurisdiction.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 596-97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Sheltra has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction.

Therefore, Sheltra's judgment of conviction and sentence and the order relinquishing jurisdiction are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Sheltra

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Mar 8, 2016
Docket No. 43562 (Idaho Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Sheltra

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHAWN V. SHELTRA, JR.…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Mar 8, 2016

Citations

Docket No. 43562 (Idaho Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2016)