From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Shell

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 5, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-538 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-538

12-05-2011

The State, Respondent, v. Chrystopher Ingram Shell, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak and Mark Anthony Sawyer, Jr., both of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Mark Farthing, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Richland County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak and Mark Anthony Sawyer, Jr., both of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Mark Farthing, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Chrystopher Ingram Shell was convicted of distribution of cocaine and sentenced to fifteen years' imprisonment. Shell appeals, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Harris, 340 S.C. 59, 63, 530 S.E.2d 626, 627-28 (2000) ("The granting or refusing of a motion for a mistrial lies within the sound discretion of the trial court and its ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law."); State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1, 13, 515 S.E.2d 508, 514 (1999) (stating vague references to a defendant's past conduct are not prejudicial and therefore do not warrant a mistrial).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Shell

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 5, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-538 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2011)
Case details for

State v. Shell

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Chrystopher Ingram Shell, Appellant.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 5, 2011

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-538 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2011)