State v. Shaw

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Troy Shaw, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2012-208387 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-208387 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-377

2013-10-09

The State, Respondent, v. Troy Shaw, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Sheppard, 391 S.C. 415, 420-21, 706 S.E.2d 16, 19 (2011) ("Our law is clear that a party must make a contemporaneous objection that is ruled upon by the trial [court] to preserve an issue for appellate review."); State v. Johnson, 363 S.C. 53, 58, 609 S.E.2d 520, 523 (2005) ("The objection should be addressed to the trial court in a sufficiently specific manner that brings attention to the exact error."); State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 694 (2003) ("A party may not argue one ground at trial and an alternate ground on appeal."). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.