Opinion
20230204
12-15-2023
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Wesley Wayne Serdahl, Defendant and Appellant
Tiffany M. Sorgen, Assistant State's Attorney, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Thomas J. Burckhard, Minot, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge. AFFIRMED.
Tiffany M. Sorgen, Assistant State's Attorney, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Thomas J. Burckhard, Minot, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Wesley Wayne Serdahl appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of terrorizing. He argues the conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence. "In reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict." State v. Grant, 2023 ND 62, ¶ 18, 988 N.W.2d 563 (cleaned up). After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the conviction. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers, Lisa Fair McEvers, Jerod E. Tufte, Douglas A. Bahr.