From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sepeda

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Sep 19, 2016
No. 74325-2-I (Wash. Ct. App. Sep. 19, 2016)

Opinion

74325-2-I

09-19-2016

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WENDELL LYNN SEPEDA, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Wendell Lynn Sepeda appeals from the sentence imposed following his conviction for animal cruelty in the second degree. We accept the State of Washington's concession that the trial court erred in imposing the $100 crime lab fee and in imposing discretionary Legal Financial Obligations (LFOs) without considering Sepeda's current and future ability to pay as required by RCW 10.1.160(3).

Accordingly, we remand with directions to vacate the crime lab fee. In addition, on remand the trial court shall reconsider the imposition of discretionary LFOs after conducting on the record an individualized inquiry into Sepeda's current and future ability to pay consistent with the requirements of State v. Blazina, 182 Wn.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680 (2015).

Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

State v. Sepeda

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Sep 19, 2016
No. 74325-2-I (Wash. Ct. App. Sep. 19, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Sepeda

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WENDELL LYNN SEPEDA, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Sep 19, 2016

Citations

No. 74325-2-I (Wash. Ct. App. Sep. 19, 2016)