Opinion
No. 74271
12-21-2018
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in an inverse condemnation action.
Having considered the State's petition and points raised during oral argument, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we are not persuaded the State has met its burden in demonstrating that our extraordinary intervention is warranted at this stage of the underlying litigation. NRS 34.170; State, Dept. of Transp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 131 Nev. 411, 416, 351 P.3d 736, 740 (2015); Westpark Owners' Ass'n v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 349, 356, 167 P.3d 421, 426 (2007) (noting that writ relief is generally available only when there is no "plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law," and an appeal from a final judgment or order is usually an adequate remedy (internal quotation marks omitted)).
The district court bifurcated the underlying action and it has been tried as to some issues but not others. The State filed the instant petition prior to the trial proceedings, which have not concluded. Without the benefit of a fully developed record from the trial proceedings below, and in light of the advanced stage of the underlying proceedings, we determine that extraordinary writ relief is not appropriate, and that the State has an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from any adverse final judgment. See D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736 (2007) ("Whether a future appeal is sufficiently adequate and speedy [depends] on the underlying proceedings' status, the types of issues raised in the writ petition, and whether a future appeal will permit this court to meaningfully review the issues presented.") Accordingly, we
The Honorable Michael Cherry, Justice, did not participate in the decision of this matter.
/s/_________, C.J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
/s/_________, J.
Hardesty
/s/_________, J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Stiglich cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge
Attorney General/Carson City
University of Nevada, Reno, Office of General Counsel
Attorney General/Las Vegas
Maddox, Segerblom & Canepa, LLP
Gunderson Law Firm
Cozen O'Connor
Berger Kahn/Irvine
Law Office of David R. Houston
Cozen O'Connor/San Diego
Law Offices of Kenneth E. Lyon, III
Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell, PLLC/Scottsdale
Matthew L. Sharp, Ltd.
Durney & Brennan, Ltd./Reno
Glogovac & Pintar
Stephen H. Osborne
Grotefeld, Hoffmann, Schleither, Gordon, Ochoa & Evinger, LLP
Bradley Drendel & Jeanney
Henderson City Attorney
Churchill County District Attorney/Fallon
Fernley City Attorney
Sparks City Attorney
Reno City Attorney
Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division
Fallon City Attorney's Office
Washoe County District Attorney/Civil Division
Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Reno
Blanchard, Krasner & French
Washoe District Court Clerk