State v. Seabrook

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Katherine Lathara Anne Seabrook, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 31, 2019

Appellate Case No. 2018-000644 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2019)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-000644 Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-409

12-31-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Katherine Lathara Anne Seabrook, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Charleston County
J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.