From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Scott

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 11, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2012-212554 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-212554 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-456

12-11-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Andrew Brent Scott, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and Andrew Brent Scott, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Spartanburg County

Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge


APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and Andrew Brent Scott, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Scott

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 11, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2012-212554 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Andrew Brent Scott, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2012-212554 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)