From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Scott

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 28, 2021
636 S.W.3d 208 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

WD 84159

12-28-2021

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christopher Aaron SCOTT, Appellant.

James Egan, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Kristen Johnson, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent. Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent.


James Egan, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Kristen Johnson, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Four: Cynthia L. Martin, C.J., Lisa White Hardwick, and Thomas N. Chapman, JJ.

ORDER

Per Curiam

Christopher Scott appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, and unlawful use of a weapon. In two points on appeal, he contends that the trial court plainly erred in submitting the verdict directing instruction for unlawful use of a weapon. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons of this decision is provided to the parties. The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Scott

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 28, 2021
636 S.W.3d 208 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christopher Aaron SCOTT, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

636 S.W.3d 208 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Scott v. State

The facts of Scott's underlying criminal case, as stated in the unpublished memorandum accompanying this…