From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Scott

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 9, 2008
175 P.3d 1028 (Or. Ct. App. 2008)

Summary

In Trautwein, a state's appeal, the state argued that the trial court had erred in ruling that the imposition of consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123(5) would have violated defendant's right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Summary of this case from State v. Trautwein

Opinion

No. (A129516).

January 9, 2008.


Cases Affirmed Without Opinion.


Summaries of

State v. Scott

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 9, 2008
175 P.3d 1028 (Or. Ct. App. 2008)

In Trautwein, a state's appeal, the state argued that the trial court had erred in ruling that the imposition of consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123(5) would have violated defendant's right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Summary of this case from State v. Trautwein
Case details for

State v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:State v. Trautwein, Brian Scott

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 9, 2008

Citations

175 P.3d 1028 (Or. Ct. App. 2008)
217 Or. App. 429

Citing Cases

State v. Trautwein

PER CURIAM The state petitions this court to reconsider its decision in State v. Trautwein, 217 Or App 429,…