State v. Scott

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Dana

    175 N.H. 27 (N.H. 2022)

    Any issues that the defendant raised in his notice of appeal, but did not brief, are deemed waived. State v. Scott, 167 N.H. 634, 643, 117 A.3d 716 (2015). Affirmed.

  2. State v. Stanin

    170 N.H. 644 (N.H. 2018)   Cited 7 times

    Any remaining arguments raised in the defendant's notice of appeal or at oral argument that are not fully briefed are deemed waived. See State v. Scott, 167 N.H. 634, 638, 117 A.3d 716 (2015) (argument made at oral argument, but not briefed or raised in the trial court, is deemed waived); State v. Blackmer, 149 N.H. 47, 49, 816 A.2d 1014 (2003) (issue raised in a notice of appeal, but not fully briefed, is deemed waived). Affirmed.

  3. State v. Cable

    168 N.H. 673 (N.H. 2016)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that trial counsel was not ineffective because "[t]he decision to neutralize the testimony rather than to object was a reasonable tactical choice"

    The prosecutor's references in his opening statement and closing argument to evidence that the defendant did not have a boating license, did not take a boater safety course, did not display the proper vessel number on the boat, and drove the boat earlier in the day with too many people on board, likewise, were "within the latitude accorded prosecutors when summarizing and discussing the evidence presented." State v. Scott, 167 N.H. 634, 642, 117 A.3d 716 (2015). Accordingly, the defendant has failed to overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, his trial counsel acted reasonably when he did not object to the prosecutor's opening statement or closing argument.