State v. Schwall

2 Citing cases

  1. Hatcher v. State

    482 S.E.2d 443 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 22 times

    In contrast, Hatcher was arraigned with counsel, who filed motions and attended hearings on Hatcher's behalf long before trial. State v. Schwall, 193 Ga. App. 694, 695 ( 388 S.E.2d 705) (1989), also relied on by Hatcher, is likewise distinguishable. Schwall's counsel attended arraignment but only learned of it through his client.

  2. Grandison v. State

    408 S.E.2d 135 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 2 times

    However, appellant stipulated that notice of arraignment had been mailed to him and the bondsman pursuant to USCR 30.1. The trial court found that he did have proper notice, and this is fully supported. Consequently, this case is distinguishable from State v. Schwall, 193 Ga. App. 694 ( 388 S.E.2d 705) (1989), wherein defense counsel was not given proper notice. 2.