From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Schwab

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Jul 1, 2015
870 N.W.2d 26 (N.D. 2015)

Opinion

No. 20140467.

07-01-2015

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Christopher Tylor SCHWAB, Defendant and Appellant.

Fallon M. Kelly (argued), State's Attorney, Lisbon, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Jason R. Butts (on brief) and Amy M. Clark (argued), Wahpeton, ND, defendant and appellant, for defendant and appellant.


Fallon M. Kelly (argued), State's Attorney, Lisbon, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Jason R. Butts (on brief) and Amy M. Clark (argued), Wahpeton, ND, defendant and appellant, for defendant and appellant.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Christopher Tylor Schwab appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of accomplice to gross sexual imposition. On appeal, Schwab argues 1) insufficient evidence supports the jury's verdict and 2) the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a new trial because the weight of the evidence was against the jury's verdict. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict and the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding the weight of the evidence was not against the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶ 2]GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, DALE V. SANDSTROM, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Schwab

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Jul 1, 2015
870 N.W.2d 26 (N.D. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Schwab

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Christopher Tylor SCHWAB…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Jul 1, 2015

Citations

870 N.W.2d 26 (N.D. 2015)