From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Schoonmaker

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 2, 1936
187 A. 373 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1936 —

Decided October 2, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 14 N.J. Mis. R. 173.

For the respondent, Meyer Lobsenz.

For the appellant, John D. Masterton ( Archibald Kreiger, of counsel).


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Schoonmaker

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 2, 1936
187 A. 373 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

State v. Schoonmaker

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, EX REL. FRANCES HART, RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD P…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 2, 1936

Citations

187 A. 373 (N.J. 1936)
187 A. 373

Citing Cases

Mattia v. Newark

The prosecutor having an unqualified designation by the proper official for the term prescribed by law, i.e.,…

Hart v. Hawthorne

One of the commissioners in charge of the department of public safety, conceiving that the appointment was…