From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Scharf

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 22, 1980
605 P.2d 690 (Or. 1980)

Opinion

TC T-32694, CA 10121, SC 25855

On respondent's petition for rehearing filed February 11, 1980.

Former opinion filed January 22, 1980 ( 288 Or. 451, 605 P.2d 690) Separate opinion on denial of petition for rehearing February 26, 1980.

James A. Redden, Attorney General, Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, and Robert C. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for petition.

No appearance contra.


TANZER, J.

Separate opinion on denial of petition for rehearing.



It has been my practice since joining this court not to participate in the review of cases in which I participated as a judge of the Court of Appeals. This is such a case and I am not participating in its decision. The result is unaffected by any action of mine.

To abstain in silence, however, would be misleading. Because this case was decided by a four-member majority which included my predecessor, the validity of the majority opinion as precedent depends upon whether I would have concurred. I would not necessarily in a future similar case concur in the reasoning of the majority in this case.


Summaries of

State v. Scharf

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 22, 1980
605 P.2d 690 (Or. 1980)
Case details for

State v. Scharf

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. NANCY LEE SCHARF, Petitioner

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 22, 1980

Citations

605 P.2d 690 (Or. 1980)
605 P.2d 690

Citing Cases

State v. Newton

In this prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 487.540, the district court…

State v. Swan

In Scharf , this court concluded that it did. It described the consent to take a breath test implied by…