From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Savage

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Dec 11, 2015
362 P.3d 1123 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

holding jury trial waiver valid despite defendant's argument that district court failed to clearly distinguish between jury trial, bench trial, and the use of stipulated facts

Summary of this case from State v. Rizo

Opinion

No. 112,882.

12-11-2015

STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Travis Winfield SAVAGE, Appellant.

Michelle David, legal intern, and Randall L. Hodgkinson, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. Patrick J. Hurley, assistant district attorney, Charles E. Branson, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.


Decision Without Published Opinion

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.


Summaries of

State v. Savage

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Dec 11, 2015
362 P.3d 1123 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)

holding jury trial waiver valid despite defendant's argument that district court failed to clearly distinguish between jury trial, bench trial, and the use of stipulated facts

Summary of this case from State v. Rizo

holding jury trial waiver valid even though district judge failed to distinguish between jury trial, bench trial, and use of stipulated facts

Summary of this case from State v. Judkins
Case details for

State v. Savage

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Travis Winfield SAVAGE, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Dec 11, 2015

Citations

362 P.3d 1123 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

State v. Judkins

Kansas caselaw does not require a district judge to explain every right associated with a jury trial for a…

State v. Rizo

Further, our caselaw has upheld jury trial waivers even when the district court fails to explain the…