From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Santoro

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 20, 1995
657 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1995)

Opinion

No. 84758.

July 20, 1995.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fifth District — No. 93-2404, Volusia County.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Robin Compton Jones and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, Susan A. Fagan and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Public Defenders, Daytona Beach, for respondent.


We have for review Santoro v. State, 644 So.2d 585 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), based on conflict with Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla. 1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

Our decision in State v. Blackwell, No. 84,071, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 424180] (Fla. July 20, 1995), is dispositive of this case. We quash Santoro and remand for proceedings consistent with Blackwell.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Santoro

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 20, 1995
657 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Santoro

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. JOSEPH SANTORO, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 20, 1995

Citations

657 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1995)

Citing Cases

Young v. State

This court raised this issue in Santoro v. State, 644 So.2d 585, 586 n. 4 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Our opinion in…