From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Santibanez

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 11, 2013
740 S.E.2d 471 (N.C. 2013)

Opinion

No. 77P13.

2013-04-11

STATE of North Carolina v. Jose Dejesus SANTIBANEZ.

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Santibanez, Jose Dejesus. Philip A. Lehman, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.


Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Santibanez, Jose Dejesus. Philip A. Lehman, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th of February 2013 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A–30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of April 2013.”

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of February 2013 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of April 2013.”


Summaries of

State v. Santibanez

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 11, 2013
740 S.E.2d 471 (N.C. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Santibanez

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Jose Dejesus SANTIBANEZ.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

740 S.E.2d 471 (N.C. 2013)