From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ruglio

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 28, 1923
130 A. 377 (N.J. 1923)

Opinion

Argued June 21, 1923 —

Decided September 28, 1923.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J.L. 13.

For the plaintiff in error, Wilbur A. Heisley.

For the defendant in error, John O. Bigelow.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BERGEN, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 8.

For reversal — PARKER, KALISCH, JJ. 2.


Summaries of

State v. Ruglio

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 28, 1923
130 A. 377 (N.J. 1923)
Case details for

State v. Ruglio

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LAWRENCE RUGLIO, PLAINTIFF…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 28, 1923

Citations

130 A. 377 (N.J. 1923)
130 A. 377