From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ruddell

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Dec 19, 2013
841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)

Opinion

No. 20130209.

2013-12-19

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Byron Clarence RUDDELL, Defendant and Appellant.


[¶ 1] Byron Clarence Ruddell appealed from a criminal judgment entered following a bench trial convicting him of abandonment or nonsupport of a child. On appeal, Ruddell argues his conviction should be reversed because there is insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. At the time of the trial, Ruddell was serving an eight year prison sentence, and had previously been incarcerated for various periods of time during his children's lives. In a civil case, “[w]hile incarceration alone is insufficient to establish abandonment, incarceration along with other factors such as parental neglect, withholding affection, failure to provide financial support, and lack of contact can support a finding of abandonment.” Adoption of H.G.C., 2009 ND 19, ¶ 15, 761 N.W.2d 565. Here, there is substantial evidence to support a conviction for abandonment or nonsupport of a child. See State v. Mertz, 514 N.W.2d 662, 669 (N.D.1994) (concluding father's conviction of abandonment or nonsupport of children was supported by substantial evidence). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDEWALLE, C.J., CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Ruddell

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Dec 19, 2013
841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Ruddell

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Byron Clarence RUDDELL…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Dec 19, 2013

Citations

841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)
2013 N.D. 231