From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rucker

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 19, 2014
439 S.W.3d 258 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. WD 76350.

08-19-2014

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Johnny RUCKER, Appellant.

Dora Fichter, for Respondent. Ellen H. Flottman, for Appellant.


Dora Fichter, for Respondent.

Ellen H. Flottman, for Appellant.

Before Division One: GARY D. WITT, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Johnny Rucker appeals from his convictions of three counts of forcible rape, § 566.030, two counts of forcible sodomy, § 566.060, and two counts of felonious restraint, § 565.120. In his sole point on appeal, Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by giving the hammer instruction because of the short amount of time the jury deliberated and the fact that the trial court knew how the jury was split numerically before it gave the instruction. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Rucker

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 19, 2014
439 S.W.3d 258 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Rucker

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Johnny RUCKER, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 19, 2014

Citations

439 S.W.3d 258 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)