State v. Romero

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Whitaker

    164 Ariz. 359 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 12 times
    In Whitaker, 793 P.2d at 119, citing Greene, 381 S.E.2d at 311, the court explained the determination of what constitutes a public place is a question of fact.

    Indecent exposure and particular acts and forms of lewdness or gross indecency with respect to sexual relations constituted criminal offenses at common law. State v. Romero, 103 N.M. 532, 534, 710 P.2d 99, 101 (App. 1985), cert. denied, 103 N.M. 525, 710 P.2d 92 (1985); Annot., 96 A.L.R.3d 692, 693 (1979). At common law, the elements of indecent exposure were the willful exposure of the person in a public place in the presence of others.

  2. State v. Doran

    105 N.M. 300 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that the prosecutor's office did not need to be disqualified because defense counsel called a prosecutor as a witness

    Issues not briefed are abandoned. State v. Romero, 103 N.M. 532, 710 P.2d 99 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 103 N.M. 525, 710 P.2d 92 (1985). We affirm.

  3. Matter of Angela R

    105 N.M. 133 (N.M. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 5 times
    Stating that children's court, as a court of limited jurisdiction, may only act in manner specifically authorized by statute

    Other issues listed in the docketing statement but not briefed are deemed abandoned. State v. Romero, 103 N.M. 532, 710 P.2d 99 (Ct.App. 1985). We affirm.