State v. Rolfson

2 Citing cases

  1. Hoover v. Dir., N. Dakota Dep't of Transp.

    2024 N.D. 8 (N.D. 2024)

    [¶15] Our decision in State v. Rolfson, 2018 ND 51, 907 N.W.2d 780, supports the conclusion the Department's general identification of State Crime Laboratory documents is insufficient notice of the exhibits the Department intended to offer at the hearing. In Rolfson, the State responded to Rolfson's discovery request by sending an "email listing exhibits and including an electronic link to documents from the Attorney General's website the State intended to use as foundation exhibits for admission of Rolfson's Intoxilyzer test result."

  2. State v. Kolstad

    2020 N.D. 97 (N.D. 2020)   Cited 5 times

    District court decisions regarding discovery violations are reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. State v. Rolfson , 2018 ND 51, ¶ 6, 907 N.W.2d 780 (citing State v. Horn , 2014 ND 230, ¶ 7, 857 N.W.2d 77 ; State v. Loughead , 2007 ND 16, ¶ 17, 726 N.W.2d 859 ). "A district court abuses its discretion if it acts in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable manner, if its decision is not the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned determination, or if it misinterprets or misapplies the law." Id. (citing State v. Myers , 2017 ND 265, ¶ 6, 903 N.W.2d 520 ).