From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Roldan

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2024
No. 2024-UP-353 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-353 Appellate Case 2023-001366

10-09-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Michael Damian Roldan, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2024

Appeal From Beaufort County Robert J. Bonds, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Roldan

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2024
No. 2024-UP-353 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Roldan

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Michael Damian Roldan, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 9, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-353 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2024)