From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rohrs

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 14, 2002
333 Or. 397 (Or. 2002)

Opinion

(CC TC96-15055; CA A97743; S.C. S46152)

Argued and submitted January 6, 2000.

Filed: February 14, 2002

On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Clackamas County District Court, Deanne L. Darling, Judge. 157 Or. App. 494, 970 P.2d 262 (1998).

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

John Henry Hingson III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, and LEESON, Justices.

Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of this case; Kulongoski, J., resigned June 14, 2001, and did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case; Riggs, De Muniz, and Balmer, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.


Summaries of

State v. Rohrs

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 14, 2002
333 Or. 397 (Or. 2002)
Case details for

State v. Rohrs

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. ROBERT JAMES ROHRS, SR.…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Feb 14, 2002

Citations

333 Or. 397 (Or. 2002)
40 P.3d 505

Citing Cases

State v. Thomas

The Rohrs admonishment, which is based on our holding in State v. Rohrs, 157 Or.App. 494, 499, 970 P.2d 262…

State v. Ordaz

After reading defendant the Miranda rights, Dickerson described the physical FSTs and informed defendant that…