From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rogers

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1926
132 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1926)

Opinion

(Filed 14 April, 1926.)

APPEAL by defendant from Schenck, J., at December Term, 1925, of DAVIDSON.

Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

Walser Walser for defendant.


The defendant was convicted of a breach of the prohibition laws. He entered a "broadside exception" to the charge which, of course, cannot be entertained. The other exceptions are purely personal and call for no discussion. They must be overruled.

No error.


Summaries of

State v. Rogers

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1926
132 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1926)
Case details for

State v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. J. H. ROGERS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1926

Citations

132 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1926)
132 S.E. 927