From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rogers

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 20, 1991
107 Or. App. 370 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

79,651-A; CA A64589

Argued and submitted February 11, 1991 Affirmed May 22, 1991 Reconsideration denied July 24, 1991

Petition for review allowed August 20, 1991

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Linda Bergman, Judge.

John P. Manning, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Appellant is a juvenile who had been placed on probation by the juvenile court for offenses that would have been crimes if committed by an adult. Two probation violation petitions were filed, alleging that he had unlawfully possessed a pistol and had violated curfew ordinances. He moved to suppress the pistol on the ground that it had been unlawfully seized. The court denied the motion on the basis that, even if it had been unlawfully seized, it would still be admissible in a probation violation hearing under State v. Kissell, 83 Or. App. 630, 732 P.2d 940, rev dismissed 303 Or. 369, 736 P.2d 564 (1987). The court admitted the evidence and revoked the child's probation.

Appellant concedes that the evidence is admissible under Kissell but asks that we overrule that case. We decline.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Rogers

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 20, 1991
107 Or. App. 370 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Rogers, Amon, a Male Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 20, 1991

Citations

107 Or. App. 370 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
812 P.2d 14