State v. Rodriguez

Full title: STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Jorge Enrique RODRIGUEZ…

Court: Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2016 Term.

Date published: Feb 25, 2016

160 Idaho 46 (Idaho 2016)

368 P.3d 666

Opinion

No. 42219.

02-25-2016

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Jorge Enrique RODRIGUEZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Jason Pintler argued. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Jessica Lorello argued.

PER CURIAM.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Jason Pintler argued.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Jessica Lorello argued.

PER CURIAM.

Rodriguez makes the same argument as the Appellant in State v. McIntosh, No. 41910, 160 Idaho 1, 368 P.3d 621, 2016 WL 743356 (Idaho Feb. 25, 2016) ; and upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons therein stated, we affirm the district court.