From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rodriguez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Feb 25, 2016
Docket No. 42219 (Idaho Feb. 25, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 42219 2016 Opinion No. 13

02-25-2016

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JORGE ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Jason Pintler argued. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Jessica Lorello argued.


Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, Nez Perce County. Hon. Carl B. Kerrick, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Jason Pintler argued. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Jessica Lorello argued.

____________________

PER CURIAM.

Rodriguez makes the same argument as the Appellant in State v. McIntosh, No. 41910 (Idaho Feb. 25, 2016); and upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons therein stated, we affirm the district court.


Summaries of

State v. Rodriguez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Feb 25, 2016
Docket No. 42219 (Idaho Feb. 25, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JORGE ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Feb 25, 2016

Citations

Docket No. 42219 (Idaho Feb. 25, 2016)