From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rodriguez

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 16, 2014
NO. 14-13-00766-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 16, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00766-CR

10-16-2014

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant v. MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellee


On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 12CR1106

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's order signed August 14, 2013, granting appellee's motion to suppress the State's evidence. On October 8, 2014, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in light of the recent decision from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in State v. Redus, ___ S.W.3d ___, Nos. PD-0067-14 & PD-0069-14, 2014 WL 4996396 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 8, 2014). In Redus, the Court held that the appellate court lacks jurisdiction unless the elected prosecutor personally certifies, within the time to perfect the appeal, that the appeal is not taken to delay the trial and the suppressed evidence is of "substantial importance" to the case, in compliance with article 44.01(a)(5) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Id. at *2-*3. The certification in this case does not comply with the statute. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5).

We grant the State's motion and order the appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

State v. Rodriguez

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 16, 2014
NO. 14-13-00766-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 16, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant v. MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 16, 2014

Citations

NO. 14-13-00766-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 16, 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. Villegas

We again conclude that jurisdiction is proper in this Court.See, e.g.,State v. Chapa , No. 01–13–01069–CR,…

State v. Martin

In the event the State does not timely file an amended notice of appeal correcting the defect, we ORDER the…