Opinion
No. 2 CA-CR 2019-0099
04-23-2020
COUNSEL Michael Villarreal, Florence Counsel for Appellant
THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
See Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 111(c)(1); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.19(e).
Appeal from the Superior Court in Pinal County
No. S1100CR201801834
The Honorable Christopher J. O'Neil, Judge
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
Michael Villarreal, Florence
Counsel for Appellant
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Judge Eckerstrom authored the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Eppich and Judge Espinosa concurred.
ECKERSTROM, Judge:
¶1 After a jury trial, Ronald Robinson was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent prison terms, the longer of which is ten years. Counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530 (App. 1999), stating he reviewed the record but found "no arguable issues on appeal" and asking this court to review the record for error. Robinson has not filed a supplemental brief.
¶2 Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury's verdicts, see State v. Tamplin, 195 Ariz. 246, ¶ 2 (App. 1999), the evidence is sufficient here, see A.R.S. §§ 13-3401(6)(xxxviii), 13-3407(A)(1), 13-3415(A). In July 2018, when arrested pursuant to a warrant, Robinson possessed 1.76 grams of methamphetamine in a baggie. His sentences are within the statutory range. See A.R.S. §§ 13-703(C), (J), 13-3407(B)(1), 13-3415(A).
¶3 Pursuant to our obligation under Anders, we have searched the record for reversible error and found none. Accordingly, we affirm Robinson's convictions and sentences.