From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Robinson

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1835
2 Del. 5 (Del. Super. Ct. 1835)

Opinion

Fall Sessions, 1835.

SCI. Fa. on a recognizance in the Orphans' Court. Pleas, payment, set-off, and the act of limitations. Replication, infancy.

Layton for plaintiff.

Robinson for defendant.


The defendant produced a receipt in full from the guardian of Mrs. Fowler. It purported to be in full of two shares of the appraised value of the lands secured by the recognizance; and not merely of a balance, but it did not amount to as much as the two shares with the interest due thereon.

The Court told the jury that the receipt, though strong prima facie evidence of a payment in full was not conclusive, and might be examined into. If the jury thought there was a mistake, and this appeared to them on the evidence, they might find a sum due the plaintiff, notwithstanding the receipt in full of her guardian.

The plaintiff had a verdict.


Summaries of

State v. Robinson

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1835
2 Del. 5 (Del. Super. Ct. 1835)
Case details for

State v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE for the use of WM. M. FOWLER and wife vs. THOMAS ROBINSON

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1835

Citations

2 Del. 5 (Del. Super. Ct. 1835)