From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 30, 2018
538 S.W.3d 375 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 79601

01-30-2018

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel R. ROBERTS, Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent. Margaret M. Johnston, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.


Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Margaret M. Johnston, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Cynthia L. Martin and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Daniel Roberts appeals from his judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, by the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and two counts of child molestation in the first degree. On appeal, Mr. Roberts argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence testimony regarding uncharged bad acts resulting in prejudice. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 30, 2018
538 S.W.3d 375 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel R. ROBERTS, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 30, 2018

Citations

538 S.W.3d 375 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)