From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct 2, 2012
381 S.W.3d 377 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 96769.

2012-10-2

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Westleigh E. ROBERTS, Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Elizabeth B. Hogan, Judge. Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Stanislav Levchinsky, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Elizabeth B. Hogan, Judge.
Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Stanislav Levchinsky, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Westleigh Roberts (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of one count of possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202, RSMo 2000.

Defendant argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence and in admitting the marijuana and the evidence concerning it because the evidence was collected pursuant to an invalid search and seizure.

All further references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise indicated.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no 378precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).




Summaries of

State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct 2, 2012
381 S.W.3d 377 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Westleigh E. ROBERTS, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Oct 2, 2012

Citations

381 S.W.3d 377 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)