From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ritter

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 2, 2024
No. 2024-UP-328 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-328 Appellate Case 2021-000710

10-02-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Damien Lavar Ritter, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2024

Appeal From Lexington County Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Ritter

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 2, 2024
No. 2024-UP-328 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Ritter

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Damien Lavar Ritter, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-328 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)