State v. Ritter

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Willie Ritter, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 18, 2014

2014-UP-232 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2014)

Opinion

2014-UP-232

06-18-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Willie Ritter, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-210570

William Bertram Von Herrmann, of Von Herrmann Law Firm, of Conway, for Appellant. Assistant Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted May 1, 2014

Appeal From Richland County Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge

William Bertram Von Herrmann, of Von Herrmann Law Firm, of Conway, for Appellant.

Assistant Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP ("Except for motions for new trials based on after-discovered evidence, post-trial motions shall be made within ten (10) days after the imposition of the sentence."); State v. Warren, 392 S.C. 235, 240, 708 S.E.2d 234, 236 (Ct. App. 2011) (holding the trial court only had authority to consider the issue raised in a timely filed post-trial motion and lacked authority to consider the issue in a motion to amend filed more than three years later).

AFFIRMED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.