Opinion
No. 2012AP1828–CR.
2013-11-19
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Nathaniel J. RICHMOND, Jr., Defendant–Appellant.
Richmond contends that if this statute is violated, then his “ ‘Due Process' was violated.” Citing a case which he identifies only as “ U.S v. Stiles, 2009 U.S. Dist.,” Richmond quotes the following language: “This court finds that the statement made after the tape recorder was turned off should be suppressed.” The statute then goes on to list several conditions that could excuse not recording the interrogation. In this case, the trial court gave the jury instruction outlined in § 972.115(2)(a). 3 See Wis JI—Criminal 180. Thus, the trial court applied the statutory remedy.