From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Richey

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Dec 1, 2016
Docket No. 43942 (Idaho Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 43942 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 799

12-01-2016

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEITH ALLEN RICHEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bonneville County. Hon. Dane H. Watkins, Jr., District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty-three years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, affirmed. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Keith Allen Richey pled guilty to lewd conduct with a child under sixteen. I.C. § 18-1508. The district court sentenced Richey to a unified term of twenty-three years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years. Richey appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Richey's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Richey

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Dec 1, 2016
Docket No. 43942 (Idaho Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Richey

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEITH ALLEN RICHEY…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Dec 1, 2016

Citations

Docket No. 43942 (Idaho Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2016)