From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Richardson

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Apr 16, 2002
793 A.2d 1214 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002)

Opinion

(AC 20700)

Argued February 28

Officially released April 16, 2002

Procedural History

Information charging the defendant with the crime of felony murder, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford, where the court, Clifford, J., denied the defendant's motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds, and the defendant appealed to this court. Affirmed.

Margaret P. Levy, for the appellant (defendant). Denise B. Smoker, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were James E. Thomas, state's attorney, and John F. Fahey, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).


Opinion


The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to dismiss the information against him based on principles of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel. As noted in the court's comprehensive memorandum of decision, the question of whether a defendant may properly be retried for felony murder after a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury on the felony murder charge, but a conviction of a predicate offense, was answered in the affirmative by our Supreme Court in State v. James, 247 Conn. 662, 674, 725 A.2d 316 (1999). The defendant's unbriefed claim, raised for the first time in oral argument, that James should not be applied retroactively is unavailing and facially frivolous.


Summaries of

State v. Richardson

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Apr 16, 2002
793 A.2d 1214 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002)
Case details for

State v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v . LUCIS RICHARDSON

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Apr 16, 2002

Citations

793 A.2d 1214 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002)
793 A.2d 1214

Citing Cases

Ledbetter v. Warden

While this may have been possible, it is now pure speculation that it could have been done. See State v.…