From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Richardson

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jan 27, 2021
308 Or. App. 831 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

A171458

01-27-2021

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kent RICHARDSON, aka Kent R. Richardson, Defendant-Appellant.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Emily P. Seltzer, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and E. Nani Apo, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Emily P. Seltzer, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and E. Nani Apo, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted by jury verdict of delivery of methamphetamine (Count 1) and possession of methamphetamine (Count 2). The jury was instructed that its verdicts need not be unanimous, which was error under the Sixth Amendment. See Ramos v. Louisiana , 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 (2020). The jury was unanimous as to Count 2, but not as to Count 1.

On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred in giving the nonunanimous jury instruction, that the error was structural error, and that both of his convictions therefore should be reversed. The state concedes that defendant is entitled to reversal on the nonunanimous count. We agree and accept the concession, and exercise discretion to correct the error for the reasons set forth in State v. Ulery , 366 Or. 500, 464 P.3d 1123 (2020). As for defendant's structural error argument concerning the remaining conviction, he makes the same arguments that were rejected in State v. Kincheloe , 367 Or. 335, 478 P.3d 507 (2020), and its companion cases.

Count 1 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Richardson

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jan 27, 2021
308 Or. App. 831 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KENT RICHARDSON, aka Kent R…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 27, 2021

Citations

308 Or. App. 831 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
479 P.3d 628