From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rich

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 28, 2021
2021-UP-137 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-137

04-28-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Risheen G. Rich, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2019-001785

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2021

Appeal From Sumter County Thomas L. Hughston, Jr., Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Rich

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 28, 2021
2021-UP-137 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Rich

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Risheen G. Rich, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 28, 2021

Citations

2021-UP-137 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2021)