From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Nov 9, 2016
889 N.W.2d 243 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

finding the testimony of a crime scene technician had been enough to authenticate a jailhouse recording

Summary of this case from State v. Richardson

Opinion

No. 15–0226.

11-09-2016

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Robert Arthur REYNOLDS, Defendant–Appellant.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Melinda J. Nye, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Robert Arthur Reynolds, Fort Madison, pro se. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Linda J. Hines, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Reversed and Remanded for New Trial.


Summaries of

State v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Nov 9, 2016
889 N.W.2d 243 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

finding the testimony of a crime scene technician had been enough to authenticate a jailhouse recording

Summary of this case from State v. Richardson
Case details for

State v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Robert Arthur REYNOLDS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Nov 9, 2016

Citations

889 N.W.2d 243 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Richardson

See State v. Weatherly, 519 N.W.2d 824, 826 (Iowa 1994) ("The test in Iowa for recorded conversations is…