State v. Reynolds

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Justin Darnell Reynolds, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 25, 2015

Appellate Case No. 2013-002637 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-002637 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-080

02-25-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Justin Darnell Reynolds, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Justin Darnell Reynolds, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Spartanburg County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Justin Darnell Reynolds, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹ APPEAL DISMISSED. FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.