From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reyna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 2007
37 A.D.3d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 288-289.

February 20, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered March 28, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him to a conditional discharge, unanimously affirmed.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Beth S. Lyons of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Michael Gerard of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Friedman, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The record supports the court's determination that Sergeant Hernandez had probable cause to arrest defendant when he saw him place nine glassine envelopes of heroin on a shelf in a store ( see e.g. People v Alvarez, 100 NY2d 549). Accordingly, the failure of the prosecution to adduce evidence of the description previously transmitted to Sergeant Hernandez is of no legal moment.


Summaries of

State v. Reyna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 2007
37 A.D.3d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Reyna

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANKLYN REYNA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 20, 2007

Citations

37 A.D.3d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1412
830 N.Y.S.2d 126