From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Renzo

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 11, 2013
2013-UP-450 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-450

12-11-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Robert Renzo, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-209193

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted November 1, 2013

Appeal From Oconee County Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Renzo

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 11, 2013
2013-UP-450 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Renzo

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Robert Renzo, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-450 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)